e
l
o
w
Tell the truth and then run.
The Republican National Committee, best known for their hit single "I Hide My Love From You in My Bunker," is sending out a mailing to
As Fred Smoot, chairman of the 193rd district, said in the sewer cavern where we meet: "These people will do anything the Bible tells them too. All we need is to infiltrate a few major printing houses and we got it made."
Religious conservatives bleat about the "gay agenda" and how legally-recognizing a loving relationship will cause the Earth to split open and for Satan to rise up and make us do evil things, like eat candy corn and wake up without hitting the snooze alarm.
But the truth about what we want is much more harder to argue against. Gay people, as the more enlightened of you know, merely want to eat your children and then use their bones to club your unborn babies.
But where is the photo of the zombie gay man feasting on the flesh of the living? Where is the photo of the Kerry campaign worker holding an expectant mother in a head lock while another campaign worker slams a crowbar in her stomach?
I'll tell you where: in mailings to
BIBLE: BANNED!
HAND HOLDING: ALLOWED!
Both sides have already begun portraying the opposing candidate as a tremendous debater, as part of the quadrennial ritual of trying to lower expectations for the nominees' performances. Kerry strategist Joe Lockhart told reporters during a conference call Friday that he would "challenge anyone to name a major debate that George Bush has been in where he hasn't been considered the winner."
I made an alfredo sauce yesterday and have an extra ¼ cup of heavy cream. Left-over heavy cream is as useful as a third testicle. If you search long enough, you can find a fast food place that will give you some sauce to dip it into, but it really isn't worth your time.
The problem with writing is that it takes effort to make sense. And time and effort don't mix.
But what does mix is this transition sentence, a.k.a. the spoon for the ceramic bowl that is this essay. I don't want to throw away the pampered milk, but my plan to put a packet of sea monkeys in it and donate the cream to a sperm bank didn't make it past their microscopes. Damn you, science! We could have had a new world order.
So I'm forced to do the next best thing: pour it in my roommate's soy milk. That'll teach that lactose-intolerant commie to mess with
I love mixing stuff.
Bonus info:
Originally, metaphor was a Greek word meaning "transfer". The Greek etymology is from meta, implying "a change" and pherein meaning "to bear, or carry". Thus, the word metaphor itself has a metaphorical meaning in English, "a transfer of meaning from one thing to another".
Amusingly, in modern Greek the word metaphor is used to refer to a cart or trolley; thus visitors to Greek airports will find themselves using metaphors to carry their luggage.
First Kerry bashing, now Bush bashing. I transcribed parts of President Bush's acceptance speech over the weekend but haven't have time to post them until now.
BUSH: "Yes, like--no, no!"
Anyone who wants more details on my agenda can find them online. The web address is not very imaginative, but it's easy to remember: dickcheneyisashemale.com.
Because religious charities provide a safety net of mercy and compassion, our government must never discriminate against them. Unless these charities are trying to marry mercy and compassion, and mercy and compassion are both dudes.
Now, there are some problems with this claim. If you say the heart and soul of
In Afghanistan, terrorists have done everything they can to intimidate people, yet more than 10 million citizens have registered to vote in the October presidential election, a resounding endorsement for democracy. And there are only an estimated 9.8 million eligible voters. I hope our presidential election doesn't suffer from that kind of fraud [wink, wink].
[talking about the decision to go to war against
And I faced the kind of decision that comes only to the Oval Office, a decision no president would ask for, but must be prepared to make: Do I forget the lessons of September 11th and take the word of a madman, or do I take action to defend our country?
(
[ring, ring]
BUSH: "Hello?"
BIN LADEN: "Hello Bushie."
BUSH: "Who is this?"
BIN LADEN: "Osama bin Laden."
BUSH: ...
BIN LADEN: "I organized the bombing on the U.S.S. Cole."
BUSH: ...
BIN LADEN: "The
BUSH: I know you! You're that guy
BIN LADEN: A bad guy? Would a bad guy call to let you know that he's not going to commit terrorist attacks ever again?
BUSH: You're not?
BIN LADEN: Nope. I'm hanging up the C4. Shaving the beard. Raiding the harem and heading to
BUSH: That's good. Cause I'm not going to have anything bad happen on my watch. I'm the President.
BIN LADEN: Well, now you have nothing to worry about. Especially not next month. [snicker]
BUSH: "Wait a minute. [Bush removes a pamphlet from a drawer with the title, "National Security Briefing, "Special Edition." He unfolds the pamphlet. Inside is an image of Rumplestilksten, =, and a picture of Osama bin Laden.] I knew it! You're trying to take my baby! And my baby is [Bush looks at opposite page of pamphlet. There is a picture of a baby, =, and a map of America] my gun. You can't have my gun. It's mine. That's why it's my gun.
BIN LADEN: Bushie, come one. You have to trust me. Take my word for it.
BUSH: I don't think so. Aren't you a madman?
BIN LADEN: Well, if you read The New York Times, yes.
BUSH: Laura said never take the word of a madman. Madman, bad man. That's why they rhyme."
BIN LADEN: You know what else rhymes with madman?
BUSH: What?
BIN LADEN: Ice-cream man.
BUSH: But I love ice-cream. You ever try that Buffalo Bill with the bubblegum nose? I like to bite his nose off and say, "Gotcha!"
BIN LADEN: And if you love ice-cream, that means you love me.
BUSH: Does it? [Bush looks at pamphlet, doesn't find anything helpful] Well, tell you what. Cross your fingers, hope to die?
BIN LADEN: Well, I'd prefer if my associates died. But sure, what the heck.
BUSH: Okay. I believe you. But don't even think of double-crossing me, or I'm going to blow up your entire country.
BIN LADEN: [worried] You're going to destroy
BUSH: No,
BIN LADEN: No, I live in…yes. I live in
"What do you think of the new guy?"
"Jon? Well...nothing."
"What do you mean, 'nothing'?"
"It's just that he seems like the type of guy who likes his ice-cream in a waffle cone, if you know what I mean."
"I don't get it."
"You know. The type of guy who washes his slacks with his underwear."
"You mean he's gay?"
"No! Come on, don't be dense. When he's in the express aisle, he only has 9 items. Got it?"
"So he's a bachelor?"
"Do I need to hire a skywriter and spell it out for you? HE'S THE PRESIDENT OF THE KEVIN BACON FAN CLUB!"
"Are you sure he's not gay?"
"You know, sometimes you're like a beer bottle without the born on date."
"I don't know what that means, but I want an apology."
"President Bush on Monday criticized a commercial that accused John Kerry of inflating his own Vietnam War record, more than a week after the ad stopped running, and said broadcast attacks by outside groups have no place in the race for the White House."
That's the lead of an AP article and in spirit many others by various news organizations on Bush's comments. Here's the problem: President Bush didn't criticize the Swift Boat commercials. In fact, he said the exact same thing he's been saying for the past few weeks--I condemn all 527s and I hope my opponent joins me in doing so--but used a trick straight out from Rhetoric 101 to make it seem like he was condemning the ad.
When asked to condemn a specific ad (e.g. "Kerry Will Eat Your Baby") he condemned the class of ads (e.g. "227 Ads--Funded By Out-of-Work 227 Actor
Josh Marshall describes this better than I do, and he has a transcript of Bush's comments so you can read it yourself. It doesn't change the fact that a majority of news organizations are reporting Bush condemned the ad when he didn't.
A few things to, um, add. The reason Bush can get away with misleading people is because of his carefully cultivated image as a plain-spoken guy who's not very good at words. Reporters parsed every word out of Clinton's mouth because they viewed him through the paradigm that he is a brilliant politician, a former lawyer, and assumed he had the ability to chose his words carefully so he could either tell the truth technically but not in spirit, or mislead people through language that allowed people to hear what they wanted to hear, not what he said.
And they were right to do so, because
It's perhaps the element that is most responsible for his success. His image that almost everyone has bought into is that he's too dumb to be clever. That he has a lot of political skills, but speaking isn't one of them. A man who uses language so clumsily isn't skilled enough to mention 9-11 and Saddam Hussein right after one another so people would think there is a connection. (Search for "Before September the 11th" in this transcript of his 2003 State of the Union address).
This type of plain-spoken man doesn't have the savvy to hold a press conference and say the same thing but juggle his words in a way that gives a lazy media the wrong impression. He can't. He's stupid. And we'd be too smart to fall for it.
Addendum: I like using the word addendum. It makes me feel smart.
Addendum 2: Props to The Washington Post for getting it right.
Design issues are relevant in every industry, even security. For example, and I direct this comment to the Comotron Security company, there are good fonts to use on a warning sign, and there are bad fonts. Bad fonts include Comic Sans MS. A sign I saw while walking a dog this morning:
WARNING
Comotron Security
Also, this Tuesday at
the Laff Factory:
come see Nutzo and Jelly Bean
Criminals will be prosecuted
As well as those hard-to-open medicine bottles
The beauty and danger of the American political system is the rigidity of its structure. One of the country's greatest assets isn't the Constitution but the widely-shared belief that the Constitution is a revered document that should be rarely changed.
I find it amazing that in Constitutional law the pre-eminent question is still, "What did the founders intend?" rather than "Is this 217-year-old document still relevant today?" Advertising has created in many of us an almost visceral sense that "new is better," and it applies to everything except the structure of our government. It is the oldest and the shortest written constitution of any government in the world, and this is a source of pride, not embarrassment.
I'm not saying this is bad. Overall, it's been beautiful. The principle of checks and balances, the set-up of the Supreme Court, different term lengths for the House and Senate--they have all worked out well...for the most part.
But the danger inherent in our political system is that it makes long-term thinking, anything over 10 years, undesirable and often politically damaging. Not only because politicians have to run for re-election every six, four, and two years, but the system of checks and balances that serves us so well also makes it hard for a few political figures to "take one for the team", i.e. have enough power to make an unpopular but necessary decision that most people would oppose.
This hasn't been a problem until the past twenty years because we didn't have any looming long-term problems back then. The social security crisis was in its infancy. There was no threat of a worldwide oil shortage (as there is now, although the date ranges from the next five years to the next 50+). But the problem now is that these issues require a much earlier starting point to deal with successfully.
For example, the current system of waiting until the public considers an issue important and lowers the political penalty for acting on it would not give us enough time to respond to an energy crisis. There's no magic alternative fuel waiting in storage that the government or private sector can invest a ton of money into and bring to the market in a few years. My hypothesis is that this would take decades, not years.
And the sacrifice we'll have to pay to support the social security system in a decade is monumental by any account, but much more so if we wait until 2009 rather than 2004. But raising the gas tax by $0.50 a gallon or slashing Social Security benefits, even if absolutely necessary, would be political suicide today. Better to wait until the problem becomes really serious and the need for sacrifice is obvious.
In short, both human nature and our government's structure makes us excel at being retroactive, but horrible at being proactive. The fact that everything has worked out so far isn't because our politicians and our system is flexible to handle whatever issue is thrown at them--they're not--but because this is the first time in U.S. history that we have issues to deal with that the current system is ill-equipped to handle.
The Founders considered a lot, but I think one area they missed is long-term crisis management. We have provisions for immediate crises, like presidential powers for military actions, and succession of power in case of assassination. But how could the men who lived in the land of spacious skies and amber waves of grain predict the scarcity of a resource for a vehicle that wasn't invented for another 100 years? Or a troubled social security system for the elderly at a time when the life expectancy was 35 years?
I don't have a solution. I doubt it's even possible to create a political system that encourages long-term thinking without making sacrifices in other areas (like the balance of power between branches of government). But, then, what is to be done?
Hi,
Except that when I revisited the article so I could link to it, I noticed it was rewritten. The DNC's point was removed and replaced with a much weaker rebuttal by Kerry's campaign that doesn't include Bush making a very similar point to the same group.
I understand the general principle of valuing a response from "the spokesperson" over "a friend of the spokesperson," but this is just bad judgment. The fact that Cheney criticized Kerry for something that Bush also said in principle is a critical piece of information to this story. I think it should have remained, either in addition to the Kerry campaign's response or in place of it.
On a related note, why does the Washington Post allow politicians to quote phrases from other politicians' speeches without printing the entire section it was quoted from to give the reader some context? Politicians from both sides take each other words out of context. It only takes a few sentences to reprint the original context, or describe the situation behind the comment. It's a non-biased way of letting the reader decide for himself if the attacking politician is honestly representing his opponent's words. Couldn't this be practice be made a policy at the Washington Post?
Sorry to belabor my point about context, but there have been several instances (besides this article) in the past few weeks where my opinion of someone has changed after learning about the context which he or she spoke.
For example, I read a quote from Kerry saying he would have attacked differently than Bush did when he was reading to the children on the morning on 9/11 and was told about the attacks. I thought Kerry said that unprompted and I felt he was taking a cheap shot at the President. While it wasn't the best decision President Bush could have made, it's understandable under the circumstances.
Then I read on a well-known blog on politics that Kerry was responding to a question about what he would have done in Bush's situation, and I no longer thought his comment was unwarranted since he was responding to a question and not making an unprompted attack. It's possible that my memory isn't serving me right, but I don't remember this being mentioned in the original article on Kerry's response. (I've noticed that The Post does include context often, but it is often in a related article a few days after the first one and/or in an "Analysis" piece.)
In general, I think The Post does a great job in reporting, better than most newspapers, but there are still a few areas I think the organization can do even better.
To all my hoes and bitches,
Jason W."
Visual: A man sits cross-legged on a chair, his golf clubs by his side. In the background is a picture of a crazed Bill Murray inserting a stick of dynamite in a groundhog hole.
Al French: "I played golf with George W. Bush."
Bob Elder: "I played golf with George W. Bush."
George Elliott: "George W. Bush has not been honest about what happened in the back 9."
Al French: "He is lying about his scorecard."
Visual: A scorecard with the "1" poorly scribbled out from "174."
Louis Letson: "I know George W. Bush is lying about his scorecard because I was his golfing buddy."
Van O'Dell: "George W. Bush lied about his hole-in-one on the 14th. He barely got a bogey. I know. I was there. I was his caddy."
Jack Chenoweth: "His account of what happened and what actually happened are the difference between the wait staff and us."
Admiral Hoffman: "George W. Bush has not been honest."
Adrian Lonsdale: "And he lacks the capacity to lead us home at night."
Visual: Inside the clubhouse. The bar is lined with foam-stained glasses. His golfing buddies are all staring at him, angry. Bush has a sheepish smile and is holding his pockets out, which are empty.
Larry Thurlow: "When the chips were down, you could not count on George W. Bush to buy us a round at the 19th hole."
Bob Elder: "George W. Bush is no Phil Mickelson."
Grant Hibbard: "He betrayed the entire country club ... he lied before our wives, saying he beat us like girlie-men."
Visual: A picture of Hitler, Osama bin Laden, and Evil Gandhi (Gandhi with a handlebar mustache) at a Republican rally, all holding signs that say "We like-a da Bush!"
Joe Ponder: "He dishonored his country club... he most certainly did."
Bob Hildreth: "I played golf with George W. Bush ...
Bob Hildreth (off-camera): George W. Bush cannot be trusted to drive our country club's golf cart."
Announcer: "Country Club Vets for Truth is responsible for the content of this advertisement. Wait, we are? Oh, crap."
Bush Tax Cuts Scrutinized
Liberal media apologizes, promises to construct time machine, set dial to "Relevant".
NASA Plans for Hubble Fix
Secret documents reveal Hubble to go down in third; Don King professes innocence.
Store to be half the size of city; White House will be moved to lumber aisle.
Verizon apologizes, promises to borrow liberal media's time machine.
Crazy doctors also ride bicycles without helmets, demand whole milk with cappuccinos.
O'Reilly spotted frosting at mouth; Brit Hume disoriented, dangerous.
On first viewing, reel pops out of protector, whacks toupee from head of snotty professor.
No one knows why economic growth has slowed down. Job gains in July were 32,000, about 200,000 less than what most analysts predicted. One reason may be that employers feel that the threat of terrorism creates an uncertain business environment and they're delaying hiring people and expanding operations until they feel things settle down.
I think the President should star in a new ad campaign designed to encourage businesses to hire more people. The campaign: "Don't Be a Pussy".
* Beauty is only skin-deep. That's true. Once you get past the skin, it's all mushy and disgusting.
Please, please, please drop the slogan "Hope is on the way."
"Mutiny" director Lewis Milestone was one of many directors and studio officials he confounded with his distaste for authority. "Before he would take direction, he would ask why," Milestone said. "Then when the scene was being shot, he put earplugs in so that he couldn't hear my direction."
Starting in the 1960s, Brando became one of the first actor-activists to march for civil and Native American rights. He memorably refused to accept his Oscar for "The Godfather," protesting what he said was discrimination against Native Americans on film and in government policy.
Instead, he dispatched to the Academy Awards a woman who claimed to be a Native American named Sacheen Littlefeather and read an abridged version of Brando's 15-page indictment of policies toward the Indians. Later, she was revealed to be an actress named Maria Cruz, winner of the 1970 Miss American Vampire competition.
"Over time, he represented the disintegration of a sex symbol, as his muscular physique crumbled and he ballooned to more than 300 pounds; he often broke his diets by persuading McDonald's employees to pitch French fries and Big Macs over his fence."
One of his instructors was Adler, who came from a distinguished family of Yiddish actors. One day in class, she asked her students to imitate chickens in a henhouse who had just learned they were about to be hit with an atomic bomb. While others flailed about, Brando sat still and pretended to lay an egg.