January 07, 2007

Borat

Finally saw Borat. It's very funny, but not what I expected. My preconception was that, at its heart, the movie was a social satire, subversively illuminating people's hidden (and not-so-hidden) prejudice and stereotypes as Sasha Baren Cohen travels through America.

While that's part of the movie, I found the movie's center to be shock comedy above everything else. Sometimes the shock came from Borat saying something outlandish (and usually anti-Semitic), but much more often it was something else entirely: nude wrestling, stumbling in an antique store, the Pamela Anderson scene, and so on.

What social commentary the movie offers is more on how people react to outlandish statements from a stranger: usually with indifference or a conscious ignoring of the remark, out of uncertainty or a desire to avoid confrontation.

The movie paints a muddy picture in this regard. When Borat enters a gun shop and asks the owner "What's the best gun to kill a Jew?", I found it difficult to judge the owner's matter-of-fact answer. Did he understand Borat and have no problem with what he said? Did he feel disturbed but decided to ignore the comment out of misguided politeness, or that he was more concerned with making a sale? Did he rationalize what he heard, like "He can't seriously want to kill a Jewish person. He must mean something else by 'Jew'."?

I think one's view of scenes like this has more to do with one's opinion on human nature, whether it be cynical or optimistic, than anything else. These scenes are too short and edited to offer a definite conclusion. It puts the movie in the odd place of needing its DVD release, with substantial extended scenes, to fully answer these questions, and perhaps lay a true claim to the land of social commentary.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Borat was mediocre at best. I prefer the older episodes of the television show.

Thus, your taste is wrong.

-Burp Lomax